From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...
Super director remuneration ...
No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...
Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....
The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....
A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...
Well, if 'value for money' is predominently fees, this is a low-cost product. But if value is rather measured as what the customer actually gets in their super account, then I'd question this product's value proposition. While it's track record isn't sufficient to make any meaningful long term comparision, according to their own website this product underperformed many alternative funds, both bank owned and industry funds, but over 250 basis points last year. cheap, passive, investing, which is what you largely get for 50 bips might look OK on a website or in a bank branch chat, but is their a too large opportunity cost to pay in the long run - time will no doubt tell.