Add new comment

Submitted by Jim on Thu, 06/01/2023 - 12:49

This is a very very good thing. I want to be clear that I support this 100%.

The irony is that while this review has been pushed by certain realms of politics and the retail super funds for some time, less member money going out to unions will mean the Industry Funds will wipe the floor with the retail funds in an even bigger way. Classic case of "be careful what you wish for" I reckon. Yeah, I know all the mark-to-market arguments...the problem with that is even after historical mark-to-market adjustements, the Industry Funds still absolutely hammer the retail funds in terms of performance.

An overdue and necessary stop to member money being paid to unions will ultimately mean more misery for the useless retail funds who (let's face it) really only exist to pilfer member funds in order to pay obscene salaries and bonuses to executives and investment managers...

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 3 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

A number of measures, including super on Paid Parental Leave, funding to recover unpaid super, and frameworks to encourage investment in the energy transition, have been ...

9 hours ago

A professional says all roads will lead back to superannuation in the next election....

9 hours ago

Iress has said that incident involving the unauthorised access reported this week extends beyond what was initially reported....

11 hours ago