Add new comment

Submitted by GP on Tue, 05/17/2022 - 23:49

Personally I'm not in favor of this legislation but not for the reasons of the alarmist media reports. Seriously ISA saying that 8 to 16% increase in house prices?

Not sure on what analysis, but I cannot see how a small number of house buyers who have extra cash are going to make any dent in the "overall" market. A lot of first home buyers would be lucky to have 50k in their super accounts let alone 40% of their total.

And even if it were so, it would be at the lower end of the market (likely units, certainly not properties above the median house price.

I understand a reaction to protect stakeholders, but don't be over the top.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

A “concerning” number of Aussies don’t know what they pay in super fees, a young super fund has said. ...

17 hours 52 minutes ago

The corporate regulator has shared some ‘disappointing’ findings upon reviewing the public communications of more than 20 trustees with regards to death benefits....

18 hours ago

According to the industry body, funds should have an obligation to transfer members in failing products to better-performing products in a timely way....

19 hours ago