Add new comment

Submitted by BW on Wed, 08/12/2020 - 09:21

Agree there is a disconnect between supply and demand. Bulk of population only willing to spend that amount, but I struggle to see how this demand can be met. I.e. who can supply at this price?

Can only see it working if adviser salaried employee of large fund with all the systems in place (and very high utilisation rate). E.g. $120k salary + 22% on-costs = ~$147k. 3 appointments per day @ $300 = $900 x 200 days = $180k. Leaves very little room for slack, preparation, follow-up and prospecting. Is this sustainable / realistic? Probably not.

Even then, the return is grossly outweighed by risk taken (business and compliance).

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The sovereign wealth fund grew $11.5 billion in the March quarter, according to its latest portfolio update, having previously voiced caution about inflation’s downward t...

19 hours 2 minutes ago

The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees ...

21 hours 43 minutes ago

Christophe Picardel, Regional Head of Private Capital for Asia Pacific, Securities Services at BNP ParibasPhilippe Kerdoncuff, Head of Asset Owners and Asset Managers, Au...

4 hours ago