Add new comment

Submitted by Steve on Fri, 07/17/2020 - 07:27

If Labor & ISA are so worried about building super contributions, why did the ISA propose during the last Federal election for Labor to reduce non-concessional contributions down to only $70,000 (from $100k)? Also, why is the ISA biased against women, with their proposal to do away with the $25,000 bring forward concessional contributions for members with under $500,000? Finally, why do they insist on a work test for 67 to 74 year olds? When they start backing off on logical retirement policy issues like that, then this Govt might take them seriously. Some of us have really good memories.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

Financial advice is having a significant impact on how Australians are engaging with the more complex aspects of their superannuation, new findings have shown. ...

22 hours hence

The sovereign wealth fund grew $11.5 billion in the March quarter, according to its latest portfolio update, having previously voiced caution about inflation’s downward t...

22 hours ago

The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees ...

1 day ago