Add new comment

Submitted by Steve on Tue, 09/22/2020 - 12:33

Yes, we cannot let the fund members make any decisions about their future retirement benefits (via Parliamentary Democracy). Perhaps a good start would be to finally introduce Annual General Meetings for industry fund members, given the industry fund lobbyists are so good at turning up at retail fund AGMs. Wouldn't that be a novel idea?

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

5 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

The newly created role comes amid the fund’s ambitions to be a ‘merger partner of choice’ in the superannuation industry....

20 hours ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

3 days 19 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

4 days 19 hours ago