The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has acted against 19 self-managed super fund (SMSF) auditors since July, for breaches of auditing standards, independence requirements, registration conditions and for failing the fit and proper person test.
As part of the enforcement activity, the corporate regulator deregistered 12 SMSF auditors and imposed additional conditions on the registration of seven others. For seven of those deregistered, ASIC chose to accept voluntary cancellations as negotiated outcomes.
ASIC commissioner, Sean Hughes, said: “SMSF auditors play a fundamental role in promoting confidence and instilling trust in the SMSF sector, so it is crucial that they adhere to ethical and auditing standards.
“ASIC will continue to take action where the conduct of SMSF auditors is inadequate and fails to meet the requisite standards.”
Disqualifications
Christopher Baldwin, of Shepparton, Victoria, was disqualified from being an SMSF auditor in October 2021 for:
Adnan Sibai, of Sydney, New South Wales, was disqualified from being an SMSF auditor in October 2021 for:
ASIC-initiated cancellations
Yuk Wong, of Gladesville, New South Wales, had his registration cancelled in August 2021 for not meeting the following additional conditions imposed previously on his registration (refer: 20-215MR):
John Campbell, of Kerang, Victoria, and Christopher Sheppard, of South Yarra, Victoria had their registrations cancelled in September 2021 and December 2021 respectively, for not maintaining the practical experience necessary for carrying out SMSF audits. They had not performed any significant SMSF audit work during a continuous period of more than five years.
Voluntary cancellations
ASIC accepted requests from seven SMSF auditors to cancel their registrations as negotiated outcomes of their individual investigations about various breaches, or for fitness and propriety concerns.
Conditions imposed on SMSF auditor registration
The following people had additional conditions imposed on their registration for breaching auditing rules:
There is a need for Australia’s superannuation funds to simplify their investment menus, according to the firm, given over a third of funds have more than 30 options, of which one or more are “arguably subscale”.
The research house is set to offer research ratings of superannuation funds for the first time amid growing demand from financial advisers.
Treasury is calling for submissions on its draft regulations in relation to the calculation of the proposed Division 296 tax.
Initially intended to offer a “simple, cost-effective” option for Aussies invested in default fund options, a super consultant has weighed in on what the scheme has actually done for members.
Add new comment