20% of super funds may fail YFYS

15 July 2021
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

Close to 20% of superannuation funds face a high risk of failure under the ‘Your Future, Your Super’ performance test and around two-thirds of those might fail the test again in the following year, according to modelling by implementation manager Parametric Portfolio Associates.

The firm’s analysis showed that the probability of a second failure was very high due to the fact that the next performance test would include 87.5% of the same data which meant that seven of the eight years measured would be the same.

Under the new performance test, products that underperformed their net investment return benchmark by 0.5 percentage points per year over an eight-year period would be classified as underperforming.

This would mean that trustees whose products failed the test would be required to notify members in writing and products that failed the test two years in a row would not be permitted to accept new members until their net investment performance improved.

Therefore to reduce the probability of failing the performance test, a fund would need to either decrease its level of tracking error or increase its expected information ratio.

“It will require quite a performance turnaround the next year to bring the fund back to safer ground. Any fund whose strategy is to rely on their brand strength and member loyalty to survive the occasional single failure should think twice,” Whitlam Zhang, manager research and strategy at Parametric said.

“The good news is that tracking error is within the control of a super fund. While it cannot be controlled to a fine degree, it can be dialled up and down.”

Those options to dial down risk might include increasing allocations to low tracking error strategies, such as passive or enhanced passive investing; implementation of stricter rebalancing rules to reduce active risk from straying from their strategic allocations; and ensuring that the fund’s risk reporting included total risk and benchmark relative risk.

“It means that investment teams will need even higher conviction in their fund managers in order to compete in this market. Investment strategies that will do well in this regime are solutions that can deliver excess returns in a relatively more predictable manner,” Zhang said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

1 day 14 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

2 days 6 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

1 day 20 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND