Limited licenced financial advisers would not be meeting best interests duty if they spoke to clients about switching to another superannuation fund or self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF), according to BT.
BT national manager for SMSF strategy, Neil Sparks, spoke at the SMSF Association’s National Conference last week and said it was the overall impression of advice given that counted, not necessarily the documentation that went with it.
Switching advice, he said, was giving advice to redirect part of all of a super balance from one to another, or to redirect contributions form one fund to another.
“The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) are clear to point out that if your documentation doesn’t talk about switching but your conversation did then all of your advice is switching advice,” Sparks said.
“This is a challenge for those with limited licence advisers because a limited licenced adviser can’t talk about switching. They can only talk about the fund they recommend being an SMSF and they can’t talk about the benefits of the fund.
“There seems to be a challenge there with what are you really telling your clients and meeting best interests duty.”
While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirement products.
In a Senate submission, the Financial Services Council said super funds should be able to nudge members on engaging with their super and has cautioned against default placements.
The Joint Associations Working Group, which counts FSC in its ranks, has issued an urgent warning to the government.
Senator Jane Hume will join the speaker lineup at the inaugural Australian Wealth Management Summit.
Add new comment