YFYS silent on crucial retirement outcome issues

27 May 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The Government’s Your Future Your Super legislation has done nothing to allay concerns that it will cause more consumer hard than good and not deliver on its objectives, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) believes. 

The institute’s submission to Treasury said the legislation was overly reliant on regulations and that the drag regulations were silent on crucial issues impacting retirement outcomes. 

AIST chief executive, Eva Scheerlinck, said: “In particular, there are no draft regulations at all to provide clarity and guidance around the entire of the Best Financial Interests Duty Schedule, which introduces an extreme Ministerial power to ban investments and extensive new duties and penalties for trustees”. 

She noted that AIST support the legislation’s objectives but it suffered from “fatal flaws” that would result in significant unintended member detriment. 

These flaws stem largely from the extent to which the package differs from the recommendations made by both the Productivity Commission and the Hayne Royal Commission,” Scheerlinck said. 

AIST also said the legislation and draft regulations regarding the super product performance test carved out many Choice products which left members vulnerable to being stapled to poorly performing funds.  

“On the one hand we have the industry regulator shining the spotlight on poorly performing Choice products, while on the other, we have legislation that not only allows many of these products to escape scrutiny, but will also staple members to them,” Scheerlinck said. 

AIST’s submission also said other key concerns included: 

  • The definition of a stapled fund should include that members should not be stapled to underperforming funds; 
  • There is no detail on what investments will be prohibited through the regulation-making power; the record-keeping obligations and contravention of those obligations; and what is required for a trustee to meet the reverse burden of proof; and 
  • A number of measures in the draft regulations are not related to the Bill at all and so are untested, having not been subject to the Senate Inquiry or submission process. These new measures, which are material to member outcomes, are the annual member meeting requirements, changes to section 68A and portfolio holdings disclosure. 

The institute also said the draft regulations were not released in time to be considered by the Senate Inquiry into the Bill which reduced the efficacy of its inquiry. 

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

3 months 3 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months ago

Michael Lovett, who left the investment firm just three months after launching its Vanguard Super offering, has taken up a chief executive role at an Australian asset man...

11 hours ago

As Australia gears up for the May budget, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has shed light on the significant global economic challenges that are shaping the nation’s fiscal decisio...

12 hours ago

A fintech leader has said that AI technologies will have profound implications for the superannuation sector....

12 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND