Warning on lifting small account threshold

4 February 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Significant insurance benefits could be lost to superannuation fund members if the Government moves to increase the threshold for small superannuation accounts to $4000 and above without putting appropriate safeguards in place, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA). 

ASFA has used a submission to the Treasury to point out that the industry held concerns when the small account threshold was $2000 - and that those concerns had been magnified by the fact that the new Coalition Government had signaled its intention to lift the threshold to $4000 and then $6000. 

Further, it has argued that the lifting of the threshold should be deferred at least until the Australian Taxation Office has the ability to appropriately repatriate the small accounts. 

“The industry response to the 2012 change was that, on balance, given the impending loss of member benefit protection, the increase in the threshold was justified,” it said. “With respect to the current proposal, there is considerable doubt about the merits of the proposed further increases in the threshold. 

“While the aim of protecting account balances may be appropriate for account balances under $2000, there is far less certainty about the need for such protection of the members’ accounts under the proposed higher thresholds.” 

The ASFA submission said higher account balances were more likely to hold insured benefits and that there was an increased likelihood that the member had consciously maintained an otherwise inactive account for the explicit purpose of retaining insurance through that account. 

“A significant number of superannuation funds, under their partial portability rules, have a “retained balance” threshold - generally around $5,000 - which insured members avail themselves of in order to retain insurance cover through their account,” it said. “Where a member avails themselves of this feature it may be many years before they need to perform the positive act of making a contribution in order to top up their account so that the insurance premiums can continue to be deducted.” 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

1 day 9 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

2 days ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

1 day 15 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND