Superannuation fund directors will have to live up to the same standards of governance and conduct as those of bank and insurance company directors under changes to the underlying superannuation laws put forward by the Federal Government.
The Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer outlined the changes within an exposure draft bill and explanatory memorandum released yesterday and said the legislation would “make directors of superannuation funds who breach their duties to members subject to the same civil and criminal penalties as directors of ordinary managed investment schemes”.
According the explanatory memorandum attaching to the legislation, the amendments will “allow civil and criminal penalties to be imposed on directors of corporate trustees of superannuation funds who fail to execute their responsibilities to act in the interests of members, or who use their position to further their own interests to the detriment of members”.
The Government has also moved to make life more exacting for superannuation fund trustees and executives by including in the legislation measures to require funds to hold annual meetings of members, similar in nature to the annual general meetings held by publicly-listed companies.
O’Dwyer said this was already a longstanding requirement for the public companies in which superannuation funds invested member funds.
Apparently foreseeing some pushback from elements of the superannuation industry, O’Dwyer said many of the measures contained in the legislative package had been recommended by past review into superannuation commissioned by both Coalition and Labor Governments.
“These are sensible reforms that are already being embedded in the practices of high performing funds,” she said.
A key element of the legislation is a toughening of requirements around the provision of MySuper products, and the ability of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to refuse or remove an authorisation for a MySuper products where they are deemed to fail to live up to member expectations.
There is a need for Australia’s superannuation funds to simplify their investment menus, according to the firm, given over a third of funds have more than 30 options, of which one or more are “arguably subscale”.
The research house is set to offer research ratings of superannuation funds for the first time amid growing demand from financial advisers.
Treasury is calling for submissions on its draft regulations in relation to the calculation of the proposed Division 296 tax.
Initially intended to offer a “simple, cost-effective” option for Aussies invested in default fund options, a super consultant has weighed in on what the scheme has actually done for members.
Add new comment