At least one major superannuation fund has actively canvassed its members about their level of interest in in reverse mortgage products and found little interest exists.
Questions asked by an advocate of people being able to access superannuation for first home deposits, House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics chair, Tim Wilson, elicited a negative response from big NSW fund, Aware Super, formerly First State Super.
Asked by Wilson whether the fund had ever completed internal research that included retirement outcomes for fund members who own their home in retirement, compared to those that do not, Aware Super confirmed that at least some research had taken place.
“We have conducted internal actuarial analysis of the retirement outcomes for home-owning versus non-homeowning retirees and referenced the different outcomes in our submission to the Retirement Income Review,” it said. “For this we used data about our members’ balances compared with the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) Comfortable Standard for homeowners and non-homeowners.
“These models are regularly updated.”
“We conducted focus group surveys of members in 2016 to test, amongst other things, their interest in either equity release or reverse mortgage products, but have not commissioned external research on outcomes,” the super fund said.
“The focus group results showed members had little interest in, or demand for usage of home equity or reverse mortgages. Most respondents were ambivalent, and reluctant to incur additional debt even where members over age 55 could see there might be benefit.”