Should part-pension be abolished?

14 May 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Budget changes to pension arrangements has prompted actuarial consultancy, Rice Warner, to reassert its claim of three years' ago that the Government should abolish the part Age Pension and require retirees to exhaust their superannuation funds.

The suggested policy initiative has been raised by Rice Warner principal, Michael Rice, in an analysis of Tuesday's Budget which noted the manner in which the Budget announcements had moved away from the position on CPI indexing announced last year.

However, Rice said his firm continued to have issues with Australia's unique means-tested age pension regime which had given rise to the growth in part-pensioners.

"Three years ago, Rice Warner proposed a solution which included abolition of the part Age Pension," Rice said in his analysis.

"We believe retirees should spend their own money first and then receive a full Age Pension."

Explaining such a move, he said the Rice Warner approach would allow an exempt amount of assets (say $400,000 for a couple) and would also count the value of the family home above a threshold (say, $1.5 million today).

"People would then apply for a pension when they had insufficient funds to be self-reliant," he said.

Rice noted that such an approach would show the Age Pension as welfare and not an entitlement – "and that may not be the view of the broader population".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Rod m on Thu, 05/14/2015 - 14:42

Sadly Mr Rice you are 100% correct , the vast majority of people in Australia believe Centrelink is their right as they have paid taxes all their working life and now want something in return , it will take a massive shift in culture to change the nations thought process.
As long as Australia continues to pay people that do not want to work then we are fighting a losing battle.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

A “concerning” number of Aussies don’t know what they pay in super fees, a young super fund has said. ...

19 hours ago

The corporate regulator has shared some ‘disappointing’ findings upon reviewing the public communications of more than 20 trustees with regards to death benefits....

20 hours ago

According to the industry body, funds should have an obligation to transfer members in failing products to better-performing products in a timely way....

20 hours 33 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND