Retail/industry fund performance gap just 0.7%

31 July 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The investment performance difference between retail and industry funds over the 12 years to June 2016 would be shown to be a mere 0.7 per cent if the Productivity Commission (PC) chose to use a performance methodology net of investment fees and tax, according to ratings house, Chant West.

In a submission filed with the PC this month, Chant West has strongly argued that the methodology used by the PC – aggregate whole of fund data – is flawed.

“As an example, a fund with an older member base will tend to have fewer members and a lower proportion of its assets under management in the more growth-orientated investment options than a fund with a relatively young member base,” the submission said.

“Over the long term, based on whole-of-fund performance data, you would of course expect the fund with the young member base to have a higher return. However, in no way does that reflect how well the funds are managing the individual investment options.”

The Chant West submission then compared its preferred methodology with that used by the PC and said that the performance difference between industry and retail funds from the actual product level data was 0.7 per cent.

It said that by comparing the returns between the methodology used by the PC and that used by Chant West it could be seen that the returns for the not-for-profit segment were reasonably close, with Chant West’s median 0.2 per cent per annum higher.

However, it said the returns based on APRA whole-of-fund data were significantly lower than Chant West’s median for retail funds and the overall industry as a result, partly due to the deduction of higher administration fees and partly due to retail funds including a wider range of options with different investment objectives.

Performance from the Productivity Commission Report based on APRA data (% pa)

Fund category                          12 yrs to June 2016

All APRA Funds                          5.9%

Not-for-Profit Funds                 6.8%

Retail Funds                               4.9%

Note: Performance is shown net of investment fees and tax. It is before administration and adviser commission.

Chant West Growth Fund Performance (% pa)

Fund category                            12 yrs to June 2016

Overall                                         6.7%

Not-for-Profit                             7.0%

Retail                                            6.3%

Note: Performance is shown net of investment fees and tax. It is before administration and adviser commission.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

2 days 10 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

3 days 2 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

2 days 17 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND