Regulatory silence on fund allocations questioned

17 November 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Consumers still find it difficult to compare superannuation funds because there is no uniform descriptors of what represents defensive and aggressive asset holdings and strategies.

A Super Review roundtable conducted during last week's Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia conference was told that comparability represented a real issue for the industry that needed to be addressed.

LegalSuper chief executive, Andrew Proebstl said that comparability had become an issue, particularly with respect to MySuper funds and he questioned why the regulators were not dealing with the issue.

"….one of the issues that we've been turning our minds to is how funds classify between growth and defensive assets and if you drill into the underlying assets of some funds, particularly in terms of alternatives, they're fairly aggressive with pulling out components of alternatives and categorising them as defensive assets when in reality they're probably more growth assets," he said.

"So there are funds out there that are holding out that they're a certain mix of growth and defensive when really much of the defensive is actually, or could be, characterised as more growth. So there's higher risk in that product but the labelling doesn't disclose that and people are going into those products under, effectively, a misunderstanding, perhaps they're being misled," Proebstl said.

He said any examination of a fund PDS provided a sense of what was going on, and he was surprised that the regulators did not get a similar sense and do something about it.

EISS Super chief executive, Alex Hutchison agreed with Proebstl around appropriately defining defensive and growth assets and the problems it caused.

"Andrew pointed out about investment, about is it really defensive or growth — that can really hit home when people are comparing you because people compare you now online, people may not seek advice directly from you and, you know, that's where you can really lose out," Hutchison said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

The property group, owned by industry super fund Aware Super, has announced two new projects with a total construction value of $320 million that will add more than 700 h...

7 hours ago

A member of the super fund has approached ASIC to investigate potentially misleading or deceptive representations by UniSuper regarding the holdings of its sustainable po...

8 hours 14 minutes ago

The median growth fund delivered 1.9 per cent in March, adding to the “stunning” rally that has seen super funds gain 11 per cent since November....

13 hours 50 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND