Grim outlook for Australian retirement adequacy

1 April 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

A significant number of Australians are unlikely to achieve adequate retirement incomes after all sources of savings are considered, according to research by Towers Watson and The University of Melbourne. 

The data reveals only 53 per cent of couples and 22 per cent of singles are set to have a comfortable level of retirement income even when compulsory superannuation, voluntary superannuation, the age pension and other retirement savings not held in superannuation are taken into account. 

The research is a sample of Australians aged 40 to 64 targeted by the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey. The analysis determined a fixed dollar amount as a target retirement income, based on the ASFA Retirement Standard 'Comfortable’ level - which is currently $57,655 for couples and $42,158 for singles. 

Australians in this age group will be heavily reliant on retirement savings outside superannuation and the age pension, the research states. 

If non-super retirement savings are excluded, the levels drop to just 32 per cent of couples and 11 per cent of singles on track to achieve a comfortable level of retirement income.  

Furthermore, if the age pension is also excluded, only 15 per cent of couples and 5 per cent of singles are expected to meet the ASFA Retirement Standard. 

Towers Watson senior consultant John Burnett advocates providing all superannuation fund members with a retirement projection every year. He believes this is a significant step in educating members about the retirement income shortfall they may be facing, as online calculators and financial planners are unlikely to solve this gap alone. 

“The research highlights how important it is for superannuation fund members to be aware of their projected retirement income, but this information is currently not being provided regularly by most funds. While super savings are only part of the equation, this is the logical starting point. Members then need to take retirement income from other sources into account,” Burnett said. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

1 day 7 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

1 day 23 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

1 day 13 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND