Govt urged to clarify and appropriately fund SCT

11 June 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government has been told that it should separately declare funding arrangements for the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT).

In a move which appears to reflect on the fact that the SCT is currently funded under the auspices of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has called for greater separation of how the Tribunal is funded.

ASFA has made its point strongly in a submission lodged with the Federal Treasury on the latest Financial Services Supervisory levy arrangements.

"Funding of the SCT – the amount of funding allocated to the SCT from the levy should be separately identified," it said.

"In addition, Treasury and ASIC should urgently review the SCT's funding needs to ensure it is adequately resourced to address its workload and meet its statutory objectives."

The submission said ASFA was of the view the provision of specific and adequate funding to the SCT via the ASIC component [of the levies] was critical.

"ASFA is concerned that the level of funding provided to the SCT on an ongoing basis is not adequate to ensure that it can effectively deal with the volume of complaints received, within an appropriate time frame," it said.

The submission said that ASFA members were reporting increased activity within some parts of the legal profession such that fund members were being actively encouraged to pursue litigation in respect of a benefit entitlement (particularly in relation to claims for insured disablement benefits) instead of following their fund's usual benefit claim and complaints process.

"The outcome of that claims and complaints process would typically involve a dissatisfied member complaining to the SCT and having their complaint heard without cost and without the need for legal representation," it said.

"In contrast, where a member engages legal representation and pursues a claim through the courts, the costs involved may in some cases represent a material portion of any benefit ultimately paid out."

"ASFA, and our members, are deeply concerned that adopting this course may lead to sub-optimal outcomes for many fund members."

The submissions aid one of the reasons cited by some legal practitioners and law societies for the increased trend toward litigation was the time taken for fund members to achieve a resolution of their complaint through the SCT.

"ASFA accordingly urges ASIC and Treasury to urgently consider the adequacy of the funding provided to the SCT to ensure that it can conduct its ongoing operations in an effective and efficient manner, and fulfil its purpose of ensuring accessible, timely and fair resolution of complaints."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

1 day 17 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

2 days 18 hours ago

A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...

2 days 18 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND