Extend super objectives to post-retirement

7 May 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Any statement of objectives for superannuation should also extend to the retirement incomes system, according to Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand superannuation specialist, Liz Westover.

Westover has sought members' views on the policy outlook for superannuation, particularly in light of the recent Federal Government's tax discussion paper which she said had finally opened the door to a holistic look at taxation in superannuation.

She said the constant amendments and announcements over many years by successive governments had long been recognised as a significant contributor to undermining the confidence of Australians in the super system.

"While this Government appears to remain committed to a hand's off approach to super [for now], it is timely for a wholesale review of the tax implications within the super environment," Westover said.

"It won't be an easy discussion and debate is likely to be, at times, heated."

She noted that, for years, taxation changes had been made with strong linkages to the Government's budgetary pressures of the day but that, more recently comments and concerns have been observed from a number of sources including the Intergenerational Report, the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) report and the tax white paper itself.

"We have an ageing population, heavy reliance on the age pension, a super system currently valued at nearly $2 trillion and what many believe, an unsustainable system in the long-term.  The placement of concessions in terms of equity and fairness has been highlighted by many," Westover said.

"While I believe these must be considered, we must also understand that tax concessions are designed to drive certain taxpayer and consumer behaviours. There is no point directing tax concessions to low income earners if they won't be utilised, particularly if that removes incentives to middle and higher income earners to provide for their own retirements when they are the ones most likely to be self-sufficient in retirement [and therefore not reliant on age pension]."

"I am a big supporter of the FSI recommendation for developing a set of objectives for our super system, although I think this needs to be extended to include our retirement incomes system. If we can be clear about what we want from our system for Australians in their retirement, then proposed settings for taxation in super can be assessed against meeting those objectives."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

11 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

1 day 3 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

18 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND