Did APRA miss super failings because of poor data?

29 January 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) could have identified problems with respect to under-performing superannuation funds sooner if it had actually gathered and analysed the appropriate data, according to industry funds representative group, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST).

The AIST also urged the establishment of a cross-agency taskforce between APRA and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to ensure that the overall performance of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) can be better compared with that of APRA-regulated funds.

The AIST even questioned whether APRA sufficiently understands the data provided by superannuation funds in circumstances where funds and their custodians have had to re-lodge information over multiple periods.

In a submission responding to APRA’s Post-implementation Review of the Prudential Framework for Superannuation, the AIST urged the APRA to bring members’ best interest into the equation where prudential and reporting standards are concerned.

It said the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services sector had highlighted many cases where members’ best interests were not the applied test with APRA presently using measures which focus specifically upon providers in the industry and whether consumers have incurred losses.

The submission said the measures currently utilised by APRA may be inappropriate because they fail to capture the cost of choice superannuation product compared to MySuper products.

It said that APRA needed a comprehensive data reporting framework and that in the absence of such data there was insufficient information to assess the performance of the superannuation system.

The AIST submission said that APRA had made many comments about the need to improve the accessibility, consistency and reliability of information that was reported to the regulator, but that there continued to be inconsistent reporting on investment costs across funds with some funds not reporting all costs embedded in investment returns (rather than reflected in disclosed fees).

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

3 months 3 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months ago

Michael Lovett, who left the investment firm just three months after launching its Vanguard Super offering, has taken up a chief executive role at an Australian asset man...

15 hours 45 minutes ago

As Australia gears up for the May budget, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has shed light on the significant global economic challenges that are shaping the nation’s fiscal decisio...

16 hours ago

A fintech leader has said that AI technologies will have profound implications for the superannuation sector....

16 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND