The Federal Court has declared that Colonial First State Investments Limited (CFS), as trustee for the Colonial First State FirstChoice Superannuation Trust (FirstChoice Fund), made false or misleading representations and engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct when communicating with members.
The court found that on at least 12,978 occasions, in communication with members of the FirstChoice Fund, Colonial made misleading representations regarding investment directions by encouraging them to stay with the FirstChoice Fund rather than move to the MySuper product.
The misleading or deceptive conduct by CFS included telling its members that recent legislative changes required CFS to contact them and obtain an investment direction to stay in the FirstChoice Fund when that was not the case.
CFS also failed to tell members that if CFS did not receive an investment direction from the member, it was required to transfer the member's super contributions into a MySuper product.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) deputy chair, Sarah Court, said: “Superannuation fund members need to receive clear and accurate information to make informed decisions.
“ASIC alleged Colonial made misleading representations which may have impacted members’ decisions about where to keep their funds and may have resulted in members’ funds being kept in higher fee-paying super products that included commissions. These actions did not put members’ interests first.”
The court declared that CFS, between 18 March, 2014, and 21 July, 2016:
CFS consented to these declarations being made and a penalty hearing has been listed for 12 October, 2021.
There is a need for Australia’s superannuation funds to simplify their investment menus, according to the firm, given over a third of funds have more than 30 options, of which one or more are “arguably subscale”.
The research house is set to offer research ratings of superannuation funds for the first time amid growing demand from financial advisers.
Treasury is calling for submissions on its draft regulations in relation to the calculation of the proposed Division 296 tax.
Initially intended to offer a “simple, cost-effective” option for Aussies invested in default fund options, a super consultant has weighed in on what the scheme has actually done for members.
Add new comment