Asset Super questions APRA over levy increase

14 June 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Asset Super chief executive John Paul has joined the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) in questioning the extent of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) proposed levy increases for 2012-13.

While Paul said he was behind many of the changes supported by the levies, he said the amount of the increase could be up to four times the current levy rate. 

Treasury's proposed financial industry levies for 2012-13 include a $180.9 million superannuation industry levy, including $121.5 million for the implementation of SuperStream in 2012-13, projected to reach $467 million over seven years. 

"In principle, all that is great and I'm not suggesting that we shouldn't go down that path. It's just a bit disconcerting that there's such an expensive cost having to be incurred in terms of the regulatory space," he said.

The underlying supervisory levy has increased to $59.4 million in 2012-12, compared to $46.8 million in 2011-12, and includes $23.4 million in ongoing Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Australian Taxation Office and Department of Human Services costs. 

Paul said Asset Super already pays APRA levies of $10,000 per year and special levies including compensation for the Trio Capital and Commercial Nominees of Australia collapse victims.

He said estimates of the savings from SuperStream were very generous, but he had reservations.

"Unfortunately there seems to be, at least initially, a lot of extra costs pushed onto the industry with the promise of some savings, and let's just hope that the savings that they're talking about do materialise and that the savings outweigh the costs," he said.

APRA said resources would be devoted to implementing Stronger Super reforms and supervisory activities including the liquidity of superannuation funds, valuation practices for unlisted assets and the solvency of defined benefit schemes.

ASFA made a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee last week saying the cost to super funds would be $10 per account, rather than the $4 estimated.  

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

A “concerning” number of Aussies don’t know what they pay in super fees, a young super fund has said. ...

30 minutes 46 seconds hence

The corporate regulator has shared some ‘disappointing’ findings upon reviewing the public communications of more than 20 trustees with regards to death benefits....

24 minutes 26 seconds ago

According to the industry body, funds should have an obligation to transfer members in failing products to better-performing products in a timely way....

45 minutes 53 seconds ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND