APRA clarifies performance test methodology

17 August 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)’s has released an information paper on its approach to administering the annual performance test for superannuation products.  

One of the many complications of the performance test was applying it in a situation where there were changes within a product (changes to the structure of a product) or across a product change (where members had been transferred to a new product). 

This would be done by: 

  • MySuper product performance calculated on a quarterly basis using the performance of the underlying option(s); 
  • Performance calculated using data reported to APRA on a quarterly basis, with the exception of any quarters where there has been a change in the structure or the nature of the product. For such quarters, performance would be calculated by splitting the quarter into partial periods to reflect the structure of the product before and after the change; 
  • The benchmark portfolio for the first period after the change is calculated with reference to the strategic asset allocation after the change; and  
  • Where unlisted index returns are required to calculate partial-period benchmark returns and the required unlisted index level is not available at the partial period date, an index value would be derived at that date through linear interpolation using the index values available immediately before and after that date.  

The performance test was a two-part test that involved:  

  • An assessment of investment performance relative to a benchmark portfolio created using the product’s strategic asset allocation; and  
  • An assessment of administration fees charged in the last financial year relative to the median fee charged for the category of product. 

If the product underperforms the combined test by more than 0.5%, the product would be deemed to have failed the performance test.  

If a product failed the performance test in two consecutive years, the registrable superannuation entity (RSE) licensee will be prohibited from accepting new beneficiaries into that product.  

Investment performance would be assessed over a seven-year performance timeframe in 2021 and an eight-year timeframe thereafter. 

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

58 minutes 14 seconds ago

The property group, owned by industry super fund Aware Super, has announced two new projects with a total construction value of $320 million that will add more than 700 h...

18 hours ago

A member of the super fund has approached ASIC to investigate potentially misleading or deceptive representations by UniSuper regarding the holdings of its sustainable po...

19 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND