AIST urges super members to consider stapling implications

30 September 2021
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

With over one million super fund members receiving notification that their fund is underperforming, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) is urging members to consider the implications of the new superannuation stapling rules.

AIST’s general manager of advocacy, Melissa Birks, said many members were disengaged with their super and might not read the notification they received from their fund.

“We are particularly concerned about vulnerable members who may not be in a position to act on the information provided,” Birks said.

Birks said there were important considerations for members of these underperforming funds, including the fact that from 1 November, members would be stapled to their fund when they change jobs unless they nominate a different fund.

“Under the previous system, most people who changed jobs and didn’t nominate a fund were automatically defaulted into a fund, which on average, was a high performing fund,” Birks said.

But in the new system, members would be stapled to their fund regardless of whether it was a strong or poor performer, she said.

These new super rules – part of the Your Future, Your Super reforms – followed the release on 31 August of MySuper products performance test and the earlier Australian Taxation Office launch of a new comparison tool for the same products.

The new performance test saw 13 MySuper products covering more than one million members classified by the regulator as underperforming. These funds were given 28 days – until 27 September – to notify their members of the result.

Birks said members should consider making use of the ATO’s Your Super comparison tool which shows fees and net returns. Additionally, members should carefully consider their insurance needs, as switching funds causes insurance with their existing fund to cease.

AIST remained concerned the reforms do not treat every fund member equally because only MySuper products were assessed in the first year.

AIST said this left out a large group of Australians who were members of super products that fell outside of MySuper, and therefore would not be tested or included in the comparison tool.

However, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), said Choice products would be included in the next test.

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

11 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

1 day 3 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

17 hours 39 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND