AIST urges Senate to keep LISC scheme

28 November 2013
| By Malavika Santhebennur |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) is urging the Senate to keep the Low Income Superannuation Contribution (LISC) scheme, saying it will benefit many low-income earning Australians.

AIST will ramp up its efforts to save the LISC scheme at a special Senate Economic Legislation Committee hearing.

AIST CEO Tom Garcia said AIST would argue the LISC was a major equity measure in the super system that reflected Australia's changing work patterns of increased part-time and casual employment.

"LISC provides more equitable arrangements for over 30 per cent of the total Australian workforce and 50 per cent of the Australian female workforce," Garcia said.

"Forty years ago, around one in 10 employees worked part time. Now over a quarter of Australian workers work part time and many of these workers qualify for LISC," Garcia said.

The LISC scheme provides up to $500 a year in superannuation for those earning less than $37,000 a year, benefitting 3.6 million Australians, out of which 2.1 million are women.

AIST's submission to the Senate will argue the LISC scheme righted a wrong on a tax anomaly in the super system where low income earners were paying more tax on their super than their take home pay.

"Low income and part-time earners are entitled to a tax benefit on their compulsory super contributions just like the other two thirds of working Australians," Garcia said.

AIST urged the Abbott Government earlier this month not to abolish the former Labor Government's LISC.

Garcia said LISC was one of the best policy measures since compulsory superannuation was brought in, adding more than four times as many Australians benefited from it than the co-contribution scheme.

Members of Women in Super recently wrote an open letter to Prime Minister Tony Abbott urging his Government to continue the LISC, arguing those who earn $37,000 or below per annum will stop receiving a $500 rebate of the tax paid on their super, which will hurt them.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The sovereign wealth fund grew $11.5 billion in the March quarter, according to its latest portfolio update, having previously voiced caution about inflation’s downward t...

36 minutes ago

The professional body is calling for the annual performance test to transition to a two-metric test, so it better aligns with the overarching duty of super fund trustees ...

3 hours 16 minutes ago

Christophe Picardel, Regional Head of Private Capital for Asia Pacific, Securities Services at BNP Paribas’Philippe Kerdoncuff, Head of Asset Owners and Asset Managers, A...

6 hours 10 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND