Claims handling key to group sustainability

17 September 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

With the group life sector grappling with balance sheet issues and premium increases, actuarial consultancy, Rice Warner, has produced a report based on five years' of claims which it believes provides key insights, including the degree to which claims handling practices can impact overall outcomes.

Rice Warner's Australian Group Risk Report points to a direct correlation between claims waiting periods and a person's capacity to return to work faster.

Confirming the findings of a recent Super Review panel on problems impacting the life/risk industry, the Rice Warner research found that waiting periods had a significant impact on Income Protection return to work practices.

It found there was a 68 per cent higher chance that a claimant on a 30-day waiting period would not be on claim within 12 months, compared to a claimant on a 90-day waiting period

The statistics also showed how long-term income protection claimants who notified within the first six months were more than 40 per cent more likely to return to work within a year, compared to claimants reporting their disability in the second six months.

Rice Warner outlined the other key findings of its report as being:

Occupations affect claim reporting delays: the delay for hazardous occupations is 60 percent higher than that for professional occupations.

Waiting period has a significant impact on Income Protection return to work statistics. There is a 68 percent higher chance that a claimant on a 30-day waiting period will not be on claim within 12 months, compared to a claimant on a 90-day waiting period.

For TPD claims, musculoskeletal claims represent approximately a third of all claims for all members (excluding younger ages, where accidents/poisons/crimes are the highest), and are at least twice as likely to be the cause of claim than from any other claim type. Mental/stress claims peak at over 20 percent of all claims for members aged 30 to 39, the highest proportion for any age band.

Mental/stress claims feature as the most common Income Protection claim cause for middle aged people, and musculoskeletal claims are prominent among members over age 50.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

32 minutes ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

16 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

6 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND