The Financial Services Council (FSC) has hit back at Industry Super Australia (ISA) claims that superannuation funds which are subsidiaries of banks give employers incentives to use them as default funds.
The ISA sought to underpin its claims by referencing a 2010 report commissioned by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and compiled by Colmar Brunton which referenced the provision of incentives such as lower fees, but also noted that 87 per cent of respondents were not aware of such incentives.
However FSC chief executive John Brogden said the ISA's claims regarding bank-related superannuation funds providing employers "egregious incentives to cross-sell products" was wrong in law.
"We have legal advice which confirms that superannuation funds and related parties cannot provide inducements to employers to secure a workplace deal," he said.
Brogden cited Section 68A of the Superannuation Industry Supervision Act which he said clearly prevented a related party of a superannuation fund — such as a bank — from paying an inducement to an employer to secure workplace default fund status.
"The only conflicts in superannuation are the deals made by unions and employer groups through the Fair Work Commission," he said. "The MySuper default fund selection process is not merit based or transparent.
"APRA is the quality filter for all superannuation funds. There is no place for selection of default funds in the industrial system," Brogden said.
The difference of opinion between the ISA and the FSC comes against the background of the FSC having taken legal action in the Federal Court to contest the validity of the Fair Work Commission's expert superannuation panel.
While institutional investors, including super funds, unanimously acknowledge the energy transition as a significant challenge, their perspectives on the extent of their involvement in addressing the substantial capital requirements vary widely.
Despite a period of increased volatility, several considerations suggest that the bull market will remain intact and the trend in shares will remain up, an economist has suggested.
HESTA has slammed Woodside’s climate transition action plan, pointing to “significant” gaps.
All merger proposals will have to be approved by the consumer watchdog under the sweeping merger reforms announced by the government on Wednesday.
Add new comment