Aware Super’s new listed equities benchmarks have seen a 40% reduction in carbon emissions by excluding the highest carbon emitter both locally and globally.
The constrained benchmarks, launched in October, were part of the fund’s plans to reduce emissions from its listed equities portfolio by a minimum of 30% by 2023.
Aware Super chief investment officer, Damian Graham, said the benchmarks was a way the fund was ensuring it could deliver strong sustainable returns for its members.
“We know that globally the top 60 emitters are responsible for more than 50% of the greenhouse gas emissions of share market-listed companies. Removing some of these companies from our benchmarks enables us to lower the carbon footprint of our portfolio, with only a modest change to our investment mix,” he said.
“… While many factors can contribute to the performance of companies and sectors, it is notable that the highest Australian listed carbon emitters excluded from Aware Super’s carbon constrained benchmarks returned 7% pa over the past 20 years compared to an 8.5% return for the Australian Securities Exchange overall.”
Graham noted that exclusion from the benchmark was not necessarily permanent.
“They are dynamic benchmarks, which means we will assess the carbon intensity of each listed company regularly to ensure that we continue to deliver for our members in terms of returns, while supporting our goal to reach net zero emissions by 2050,” he said.
The property group, owned by industry super fund Aware Super, has announced two new projects with a total construction value of $320 million that will add more than 700 homes to Melbourne’s rental market.
While institutional investors, including super funds, unanimously acknowledge the energy transition as a significant challenge, their perspectives on the extent of their involvement in addressing the substantial capital requirements vary widely.
Despite a period of increased volatility, several considerations suggest that the bull market will remain intact and the trend in shares will remain up, an economist has suggested.
HESTA has slammed Woodside’s climate transition action plan, pointing to “significant” gaps.
Add new comment