There is nothing to stop superannuation funds from directing asset allocations towards so-called “impact investments” but, ultimately, they are only likely to do so if they believe it is in the best interests of their members.
That is the bottom line of an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) submission responding to a Federal Treasury discussion paper on social impact investing.
The submission has effectively countered suggestions that the sole purpose test might preclude impact investments on the part of superannuation funds, but points out that trustees are likely to take a highly pragmatic approach.
“ASFA considers that the current legislative framework for superannuation funds is not a barrier to superannuation funds investing in impact investments,” the submission said but pointed out that trustees clearly understood that their primary purpose was to “deliver retirement savings to fund members”.
The submission said there were barriers to superannuation funds investing in impact investment assets with some of those barriers relating to the inherent nature of markets that are in the early stages of development.
It said the main barriers to superannuation funds investing in impact investment assets included:
Over 90 finalists have been chosen to compete at the 36th annual Fund Manager of the Year Awards.
The asset manager is bolstering its investments in the global energy transition and climate opportunities.
The ethical investment manager has reported record FUM as its growth trajectory continues apace.
The chief investment officers of UniSuper, HESTA, and TelstraSuper have elaborated on opportunities and risks that are top of mind when it comes to illiquid assets like private credit within their portfolios.
Add new comment