JP Morgan forced to re-evaluate Q1 earnings

17 July 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

JP Morgan Chase has been forced to reduce its previously reported net income for the first quarter of the year after the integrity of staff in its chief investment office was called into question.

The re-evaluated position slashes JP Morgan's reported net earnings by $459 million and is related to traders in the chief investment office obligations to mark trade positions where they expected to execute in the market.

The company discovered employees may have tried to avoid showing the full amount of losses in the portfolio during the first quarter.

"We are no longer confident that the trader marks reflected good faith estimates of fair value at quarter end and we decided to remark the positions utilising external 'mid-market' benchmarks, adjusted for liquidity considerations," the global investment firm said.

JP Morgan also remediated internal controls for the financial reporting of the synthetic credit portfolio after the breaches were discovered.

It said previously filed financial statements for the first quarter could not be relied upon and a new financial statement is expected to be filed in due process.

JP Morgan said the restatement would have no effect on total earnings or revenues for the company year-to-date. The company reported net income of $5 billion or $1.21 per share on revenue of $22.9 billion, including trading losses for the second quarter.

The firm transferred the synthetic credit positions to its investment bank, closing down the CIO synthetic credit branch.

An extensive review of CIO trading losses determined the bank had the expertise, capacity and trading platforms to handle the synthetic credit portfolio.

JP Morgan said it believed the events were isolated to the CIO which had undertaken a complete management overhaul and improved governance standards.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

6 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

1 day 5 hours ago

A survey of almost 6,000 fund members has identified weakening retirement confidence, particularly among those under 55 years of age, signalling an opportunity for super ...

1 day 6 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND