BCA pushes for intergenerational surplus

7 March 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

A modest ‘intergenerational surplus' should be carved out of any budget surplus to fill the projected fiscal gap expected to arise as a result of demographic pressures, according to the Business Council of Australia (BCA).

The Government needed a major rethink of fiscal policy and its execution, as Australia's sound economic fundamentals were not being reflected in levels of confidence domestically, BCA said in its Budget submission 2013-2014.

It said Australians had watched the national Budget position deteriorate through the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and public debt levels had understandably risen — but expectations were that this would be corrected, it said.

"The articulation by the Government of a strong and credible strategy on fiscal policy is needed to boost confidence," it said.

"This will also give Australians greater certainty that we will be able to pay for public services and infrastructure in the future and be resilient to the economic volatility that will inevitably come our way," it said.

A credible and achievable strategy, at minimum, would need Budget surpluses to grow to 1-2 per cent of GDP, while refreshed fiscal rules should reinforce medium-term discipline on fiscal policy to provide a "corridor of stability for the long-term budget", it said.

Global economic uncertainty and falling terms of trade that had placed pressure on revenues and precipitated the pullback from the commitment to surplus in 2012-13 reflected the need for a medium-term anchor to provide a buffer against terms of trade volatility, according to BCA.

Expenditure restraint in the short-term and a review of the size, scope and efficiency of Government should allow it to begin to anchor the budget to medium-term objectives, BCA said.

According to BCA, in addition to the intergenerational surplus the Government needed to:

• Place a hard cap on the size of Government by holding tax as a share of GDP below 23.7 per cent; and

• Specify a new objective targeting a percentage surplus, based on "recharging" fiscal readiness every 13 years to allow fiscal policy to make 3 per cent of GDP contribution if needed.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

6 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

22 hours 39 minutes ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

12 hours 58 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND