The relationship between the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) must remain separate and must be seen to be separate, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) said.
In a submission to Treasury in response to the ‘Proposed Industry Funding Model for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Consultation Paper', the AIST urged for clarification on the relationship between ASIC and the SCT, making it clear that ASIC was a service provider to the SCT.
"AIST does not and would not support the funding of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) to be collected by or on behalf of ASIC," the submission said.
"In addition, we consider that the present process, where there is no real transparency, must be changed to ensure that the industry is perfectly in the clear as to how much the SCT costs to operate."
The AIST proposed three steps for this process:
"Ideally, we would prefer that the SCT submissions for funding went through the processes in the cost recovery guideline, and a cost recovery impact statement should be completed at the Tribunal," AIST said.
While it supported SCT funding through the APRA levy, AIST stressed it must be answerable to Parliament and the industry, and base its funding decisions on these factors.
The AIST also said the proposed methodology for deciding on levy mechanisms did not consider that two identical funds in terms of size could have different risk profiles and necessitate different supervisory considerations.
"In particular, we note that this model does not differentiate between two funds that are greater than $10 billion in funds under management, whether greater than this by a small margin (e.g. $11 billion) to a very large fund (e.g. $70 billion)," it said.
The Financial Services Minister says the amendments to the SIS Act within the first QAR bill will “clarify the law to affirm the status quo”.
Superannuation funds have thrown their support behind the QAR reforms but want a “clear statement” that they will not be required to check all member SOAs.
In its latest report, the corporate regulator says the deduction of advice fees has led to instances of “inappropriate erosion of members’ balances”.
Financial advice is having a significant impact on how Australians are engaging with the more complex aspects of their superannuation, new findings have shown.
Add new comment