Retirement products that use traditional strategic asset allocation will fail as it is not appropriate for shorter time horizons, according to Insight Investment.
Presenting online at the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF), Insight Investment specialist, Adam Kibble, said strategic asset allocation key inputs were prone to significant errors over shorter periods.
While tactical asset allocation was critical to reduce risk, it was not appropriate for limiting downside risk, he said.
“Tactical asset allocation is designed to tilt allocation away from the neutral position and requires managers to get it right so it doesn’t eliminate risk, it just tilts risk,” Kibble said.
“Reducing risk should be able to reduce uncertainty by narrowing the range of potential outcomes and this is achieved by managing downside risk.
“And strategic asset allocation doesn’t manage downside risk, it relies on time to recover performance.”
Kibble said often retirement products attempted to increase certainty by over-allocating towards defensive assets like term deposits and this generally led to lower overall returns.
He noted a better retirement strategy would be to set a return objective over a set period and maximise the chance of achieving that objective.
Kibble said this could be achieved by:
New research has shown Australians are retiring at their oldest age in over 50 years.
The $300 billion fund has announced the development of a new flexible lifetime income option in partnership with TAL.
As regulators spur funds to focus on Australia’s ageing population and overseas players voice their interests, professionals expect a boost in innovative activity in super.
Over half of Australians hope to live to 100 years, according to MetLife, and 90 per cent believe retirement should be redefined to account for a longer lifespan.
Good article as particularly of interest in post retirement solutions
Add new comment